Technology Strategy
Roadmap definition, architecture decisions, and technical direction aligned to your business goals, not engineering for its own sake.
I help companies build
the technology leadership
they actually need.
Fractional CTO for startups, scale-ups and growing businesses who need senior technical direction, without the full-time commitment.
Roadmap definition, architecture decisions, and technical direction aligned to your business goals, not engineering for its own sake.
Build and scale high-performance engineering teams. Hiring, culture, delivery excellence, and the systems that sustain them.
Identify and deploy AI initiatives that cut cost, increase speed, and open new markets. Strategy through to implementation.
Independent assessment of technology, architecture, and team capability for investors, acquirers, and boards.
Technical credibility in the room. Engineering translated into business language on calls, in decks, and in the boardroom.
Full executive capability. Part-time commitment. Access to a seasoned CTO without the $300K overhead. Also available as an interim CTO while you hire, or to keep things running while your CTO is on leave.
Deployed agentic AI workflows that cut proposal turnaround in half, directly accelerating deal flow and freeing senior capacity for higher-value work.
Delivered a Microsoft Copilot agent that cut artifact generation time by 50% for one fund. For another, prioritised a portfolio of AI initiatives and presented the business cases to internal stakeholders.
Scaled engineering from a small team to a 150-person organisation, opening $10m+ in annual opportunities through technical credibility and delivery excellence. Personally owned $2.5m in client projects for MyDeal and Grill'd, from architecture through to handover.
Built Listcorp from zero to 600,000 monthly active users on a three-engineer team, making all infrastructure and architecture decisions from day one.
I'm Daryl Teo, a technology executive with 20 years of engineering experience and over a decade leading product and engineering organisations. I've served as CTO across multiple companies, from early-stage startups to established platforms, across industries including financial services, superannuation, retail, e-commerce and AI.
I hold a Digital MBA from CTO Academy and a Bachelor of Software Engineering from RMIT University.
Based in Melbourne, Australia. Available globally for remote and hybrid engagements.
Most fractional CTOs in Australia charge a monthly retainer, and the price follows the time commitment. Advisory-only arrangements of a few hours a month start from around $1,000 a month. Hands-on leadership of roughly one day a week typically runs $5,000 to $6,000 a month, two days a week around $11,000, and a near full-time embedded CTO $20,000 or more. For comparison, a full-time CTO commonly costs $250,000 or more in salary, before superannuation, equity and recruitment fees.
I scope each engagement to the outcome you need and quote after an initial conversation.
A CTO sets technology direction and makes sure technology spend serves the business. That covers technology strategy and roadmap, architecture and build-versus-buy decisions, hiring and leading the engineering team, managing vendors and delivery, security and risk, and representing technology to the board and investors. A fractional CTO does the same work part-time, usually one to three days a week.
A good CTO turns technology spend into business results: faster delivery, fewer costly rebuilds, lower vendor and cloud costs, an engineering team that can hire and retain good people, and technical credibility with investors and acquirers.
Most growing businesses need senior technology decisions before they need a full-time technology executive. A fractional CTO fits when you need direction but not 40 hours a week of it: an early product build, a first engineering hire, a stalled delivery program, an AI initiative, or preparation for investment or sale. A full-time CTO makes sense once technology leadership is a daily, full-time load.
Some fractional CTOs will write code, but it is usually an expensive use of their skill set. You are paying for senior judgement: direction, architecture, hiring and the decisions your team cannot make on its own, and every hour spent coding is an hour not spent on those. If you need hands-on delivery as well, raise it early so it can be scoped and priced into the engagement from the start.
Minimum commitments vary between providers, and fractional CTO engagements come in many lengths. Short engagements suit situations like an interim CTO while a permanent hire is recruited, or keeping the ship running while an existing CTO is on leave. Longer engagements suit ongoing part-time technology leadership with no fixed end date.
I do not set a minimum. An engagement with me can run from a single month to an ongoing arrangement, depending on what you need.
Yes. The hard part of AI adoption is deciding which initiatives are worth funding and getting them into production, and that is technology leadership work.
I help leadership teams prioritise AI initiatives, build the business cases, and deliver them.
Yes. Technical due diligence assesses architecture, code quality, security, scalability, technical debt and team capability, so investors, acquirers and boards know what they are buying and what it will cost to fix.
I provide independent assessments for investment, acquisition and board decisions.
No pitch. Let's chat, and if I'm not the right fit, I'll help you find someone who is.